🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family pays $27,000 each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I can name multiple businesses who are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When you add these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.